0% chance…

During the third round of the Candidates, I observed  a funny conversation on Twitter between two leading Dutch grandmasters Anish Giri and  Erwin l’Ami, concerning the game Svidler-Kramnik.

Erwin l’Ami in Wijk aan Zee 2013.

Erwin, following the game at home, suggested a crazy variation:

@erwinlami: 41.Qc8 e4! 42.fxe4 Qe2 43.Rf3 Rxd6 44.Qe8! f6 45.e5! looks killing, but 45…f5! 46.gxf5 Rf6!! saves. 0% chance this will happen though.

and Erwin added a little later: Svidler played 41.Qc6 which should transpose after 41…e4 42.fxe4 Qe2 43.Rf3 Rxd6 33.Qe8.

@anishgiri tweeted: I bet you on this one.

@erwinlamiTaken! If you win you the bet you get to play 1st board in the Olympiad and I will go and sit somewhere else 🙂

@erwinlamiAh, and if you lose the bet you also get board 1!

@anishgiri: If I lose the bet, Kramnik will not get the board 1 😉

(I admit , I had to think about this last tweet for a minute…)

@fabianocaruana: 45…f5 46. gf5 Rf6 is unbelievable… Times like this I wonder what my thoughts would be playing over the board.

@erwinlamiSo, I said 0% chance…

…and the official website tweeted: @candidatesfideSeems, we believed in your intuition more than you and retweeted as soon as this variation came out. 

@erwinlamiI appreciate your trust! 🙂 





It's only fair to share...Share on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterPin on PinterestShare on FacebookShare on RedditEmail this to someone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *